Legal Opinion

People v. Whitfield

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2000No. 113934, Calendar No. 6PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was charged with possessing less than 25 grams of heroin. The trial court suppressed the evidence against him and dismissed the prosecution on the ground that a search warrant had been based on “[m]ere suspicion,” instead of probable cause. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We find that the magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that a search would uncover evidence of wrongdoing, and we therefore reverse the judgments of the Court of Appeals and the trial court.

i

On July 10, 1997, a district court magistrate issued a warrant authorizing the search of a home at 18072 Bloom…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. People v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. TalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. MullenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. HolidayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. People of Michigan v. Astavian Dntae McMillianMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. People of Michigan v. Brian Edward BrooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API