Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Kirby
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided July 16, 2002No. Civ.A. 5:01-0289PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs pro se complaint was referred by Standing Order to the Honorable R. Clarke VanDervort, United States Magistrate Judge, who reviewed the case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B) and (b)(3) and submitted Proposed Findings and Recommendation (PF & R) for disposition. Plaintiff timely objected to the PF & R.
Having reviewed Plaintiffs objections de novo, the Court concludes they are without merit. Dixon objects the Montcalm 1 notice was not sent to publishers of materials denied to him by prison authorities. The case…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Jones v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Hughbanks v. DooleyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2011
- Prison Legal News v. LehmanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2003
- CORDERO v. KELLEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.