Legal Opinion
Hughbanks v. Dooley
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 19, 2011No. Civ. 10-4064-KESPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DENYING APPOINTED COUNSEL
KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Kevin L. Hughbanks, is incarcerated at Mike Durfee State Prison in Springfield, South Dakota. He filed a pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging, in addition to several other claims, that the South Dakota Department of Corrections’ (DOC’s) correspondence policy prohibiting the delivery of bulk-rate mail, in particular as applied to catalogs, is unconstitutional. He now moves for preliminary relief and asks the court to invalidate portions of the DOC’s correspondence…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brakeall v. BieberDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2019
- Brakeall v. Stanwick-KlemikDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2019
- Christians v. YoungDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
- Cody v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
- Cowherd v. LeidholtDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.