Legal Opinion
Toa Construction Co. v. Tsitsires
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided July 7, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerald Lebovits, J.
1. Introduction
In July 2000, petitioner served respondent with a combined termination notice and nonrenewal notice (Golub notice). The Golub notice stated that petitioner was terminating respondent’s tenancy on the alleged ground that respondent did not occupy the subject premises as a primary residence from December 1, 1998 to November 30, 2000. The Legislature has exempted from rent-regulation protection apartments that tenants do not use as their primary residence in order to return underutilized apartments to the marketplace. (See e.g. Emay Props.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cier Industries Co. v. HessenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Emay Properties Corp. v. NortonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1987
- Berwick Land Corp. v. MucelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Sharp v. MelendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Coronet Properties Co. v. BrychovaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- TOA Construction Co. v. TsitsiresAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
- TOA Construction Co. v. TsitsiresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008