Coronet Properties Co. v. Brychova
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stephen P. Kramer, J.
This case presents the question of whether the Rent Stabilization Law and Code extend to an apartment leased by an itinerant tenant who spends all but a handful of days every year traveling to various professional engagements. The statute provides that it shall not extend to “housing accommodations which are not occupied by the tenant * * * as his primary residence”. (Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974, § 5, subd a, par [11], as added by L 1974, ch 576, § 4, as amd by L 1983, ch 403, § 55.)
The facts in this case are as follows. The tenant leased…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Sommer v. Ann Turkel, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1987
- Rose Associates v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Emel Realty Corp. v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Emel Realty Corp. v. CareyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001
- Chelsmore Apts., L. L. C. v. GarciaCivil Court of the City of New York · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.