Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Barker

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1957No. 8580PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Justice.

Appellant, William Byron Hoffman, a minor, brought this action by his guardian ad litem to recover damages for personal injuries received when struck by an automobile driven by defendant, Lee Barker. By the amended complaint it is alleged that the injuries of such appellant were caused by the concurrent negligence of defendants. The appellants, State of Idaho, and Walter C. Musgrave, State Insurance Manager, State of Idaho, are subrogees under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, I.C. § 72-101 et seq., claiming re-imbursement for funds paid under such law to appellant, William…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Geisen v. LuceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Hellan v. Supply Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Grantham v. Watson Bros. TransportationNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lundy v. HazenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Smith v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Walenta v. Mark Means Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Woodman v. KnightIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Lindhartsen v. MylerIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API