Legal Opinion
McLane v. Territory
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1903No. Criminal No. 169PublishedCited by 7 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Pinal. F. M. Doan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtKent, C. J.
The indictment under which the defendants were convicted charged them with the crime of grand larceny, in stealing four head of cattle, of the aggregate value of sixty dollars. The jury, by their verdict, found the defendants “guilty as charged in the indictment, and ask mercy of the court. ’ ’
The Penal Code of Arizona contains the following provision :—
*152“Sec. 443. Larceny is divided into two degrees, the first of which is termed grand larceny; the second, petit larceny.
“Sec. 444. Grand larceny is larceny committed in either of the following cases: (1) When the property taken is of value…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cobia v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- People v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Hogan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- McGee v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1844
- White v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. NoahNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Maxwell v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1906
- Hampston v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Brough v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Buffehr v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.