Legal Opinion

Hampston v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1928No. Criminal No. 687PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The charging part of the information is in the following words:

“The said Bessie M. Hampston on or about the 7th day of June, 1927, and before the filing of this information, at the County of Cochise, State of Arizona, was then and there the clerk, agent, and servant of H. E. Wootton and H. E. Wootton, as guardian of the persons and estates of William H. Wootton, James E. Wootton, Daniel Wootton, and Harry E. Wootton, minors, and then and there by virtue of her said employment as such clerk, agent, and servant, there came into the possession, care, custody, and control of her, the said Bessie…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Holder v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. McLane v. TerritoryArizona Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Maxwell v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Buffehr v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ottaway v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. Brough v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API