Suydam v. Healy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, James B. Healy, from a judgment of the County Court of Kings county in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 22d day of June, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 16th day of July, 1903, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
The plaintiff was a real estate broker, and was concededly employed by the defendant to exchange certain property on Fulton street, borough of Brooklyn, for other property in the same borough. There is no dispute that the plaintiff procured a person ready, willing and able to enter into an agreement for the exchange of prop-' erty upon the terms dictated by the defendant, and the only conflict of evidence of any importance was upon the question of whether the defendant was willing to close the contract after' the work had been done. If it were material, the evidence is sufficient…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Charles v. CookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williamson, Picket, Gross, Inc. v. HirschfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Backer v. RatkowskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Graff v. BilletNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Wooster v. MetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926