Legal Opinion

Wooster v. Metz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1926Published

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, !.

The action was brought by a real estate broker for his commissions alleged to have been earned in procuring a purchaser for the two-flat house owned by the defendant.

Negotiations between plaintiff and defendant relative to the sale of the property were conducted in March, 1924. The plaintiff *306procured a prospective purchaser, one Wagner. About March eighteenth defendant delivered to plaintiff an unsigned memorandum containing his selling price and general terms of sale, mentioning Wagner by name, concluding with, “ This offer expires March 25th, 1924, and I reserve right to withdraw…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mooney v. . ElderNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Hopwood v. CorbinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  3. Suydam v. HealyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API