Legal Opinion · Dissent

Graff v. Billet

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1985Published

1DissentKaye, J.

The Appellate Division’s decision, reached entirely as a matter of law, upholds the right of a seller (defendant) offered a better price to escape payment of a fee to a real estate broker (plaintiff) who has produced a buyer ready, willing and able to purchase the property on the seller’s terms. In defendant’s words: “Marvin Billet testified (and the trial court and Appellate Division both found) that he did not enter into the proposed contract of sale with Mr. Steinberg so that he could accept Mr. Little’s better offer.”

The parties to a brokerage contract may of course fashion their own…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wagner v. DerecktorNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Mooney v. . ElderNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Colvin v. . Post Mortgage Land Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Young v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  5. Tanenbaum v. . BoehmNew York Court of Appeals · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API