Legal Opinion
Gee v. Planned Parenthood of Gulf Coast, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 10, 2018No. 17-1492Relating-toCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
2DissentJustice Thomas, joined by Justice Alito and Justice Gorsuch
One of this Court's primary functions is to resolve "important matter[s]" on which the courts of appeals are "in conflict." Sup. Ct. Rule 10(a); e.g., Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99 , 106, 116 S.Ct. 457 , 133 L.Ed.2d 383 (1995). This case and Andersen v. Planned Parenthood of Kan. and Mid-Missouri, No. 17-1340, present a conflict on a federal question with significant implications: whether Medicaid recipients have a private right of action to challenge a State's determination of "qualified" Medicaid providers under 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23) and…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Planned Parenthood of Kan. v. AndersenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Hewitt v. Helix Engy Solutions GrpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Planned Parenthood of Grt TX v. Courtney PhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Planned Parenthood v. Joshua BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Robinson v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Rogers v. GrewalSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.