Theophelis v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PHILIP PRATT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1) for a refund of federal income taxes, claiming that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) incorrectly disallowed a deduction for the cost of a covenant not to compete. The matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The parties have briefed the issues and presented oral argument to the Court. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is hereby granted.
All material facts are undisputed. On November 28, 1975, plaintiffs executed an agreement to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Charles W. Balthrope and Mary v. Balthrope v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Kinney v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
- Better Beverages, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Markham & Brown, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Moscowitz v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jahn v. ReganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
- George L. Theophelis and Arlene Theophelis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Jahn v. ReganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985