Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided September 26, 1972No. Docket No. 2935-68PublishedCited by 37 opinions

In 1962, P sold his insurance agency. The contract of sale included a covenant not to compete and provided for the transfer of the agency's insurance expirations. No allocation was made in the contract between the amount paid for the expirations and the amount paid for the covenant not to compete.

Read the full summary

In 1962, P sold his insurance agency. The contract of sale included a covenant not to compete and provided for the transfer of the agency's insurance expirations. No allocation was made in the contract between the amount paid for the expirations and the amount paid for the covenant not to compete. Held: (1) Under the circumstances, the covenant not to compete had substantial value, and a portion of the purchase price is allocable to it; (2) the amount to be allocated to the covenant has been determined.

1Opinion of the Court

SimpsoN, Judge:

Tbe respondent determined a deficiency of $49,-200.34 in tbe petitioners’ 1962 Federal income tax. Tbe only issue for decision is what portion, if any, of the amount paid for an insurance agency is allocable to tbe covenant not to compete.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Some of the facts have been stipulated, and those facts are so found. The petitioners, Harry A. and Betty W. Kinney, are husband and wife and maintained their residence in Houston, Tex., at the time the petition was filed in this case. They filed their 1962 j oint Federal income tax return with the district director of internal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Schulz v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  3. Michaels v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  4. Charles W. Balthrope and Mary v. Balthrope v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Maurice L. KillianCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Major v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  2. Forward Communications Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Peterson Machine Tool, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  4. Better Beverages, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. G C Services Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API