Legal Opinion

Markham & Brown, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1981No. 80-2106 and 81-1023PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, Markham & Brown, Inc. was of the opinion that its repurchase of stock was deductible as an ordinary and necessary business expense under 26 U.S.C. § 162 and that its unilateral allocation of amounts for covenants not to compete could be amortized. The Internal Revenue Service thought otherwise and denied Markham & Brown’s claims for refunds. The district court affirmed. Contending that the district court had erred both on the facts and on the law, Markham & Brown sought relief in this court. Markham & Brown’s briefs and arguments are capital, but so were its expenditures, thus…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woodward v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Charles W. Balthrope and Mary v. Balthrope v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Better Beverages, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Five Star Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. Jim Walter Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Houston Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Banc One Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Lane Bryant, Inc. And the Limited, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. Frederick Weisman Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  5. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API