Markham & Brown, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The appellant, Markham & Brown, Inc. was of the opinion that its repurchase of stock was deductible as an ordinary and necessary business expense under 26 U.S.C. § 162 and that its unilateral allocation of amounts for covenants not to compete could be amortized. The Internal Revenue Service thought otherwise and denied Markham & Brown’s claims for refunds. The district court affirmed. Contending that the district court had erred both on the facts and on the law, Markham & Brown sought relief in this court. Markham & Brown’s briefs and arguments are capital, but so were its expenditures, thus…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Woodward v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Charles W. Balthrope and Mary v. Balthrope v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Better Beverages, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Five Star Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Jim Walter Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Houston Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Banc One Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
- Lane Bryant, Inc. And the Limited, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Frederick Weisman Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
- Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.