Legal Opinion

Sedlitsky v. Pareso

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1993No. 00827 PGH 92PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from the judgment entered on April 29, 1992 in favor of appellee, Marlene Sedlitsky. Appellant, James D. Pareso, MD, presents two questions on appeal:

I. Has the federal law concerning the reporting of payment of medical malpractice judgments rendered the suggested “Irrelevant Considerations” charge factually incorrect and prejudicial to defendants in medical malpractice actions?

II. Were the trial court’s instructions regarding the requirement that other possible causes of plaintiffs injury be sufficiently eliminated misleading and not adequate to clarify the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. Dravo Corp., Keystone Div.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Ott v. Buehler Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Sedlitsky v. ParesoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Levine v. RosenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Beechwood Commons Condominium Ass'n v. Beechwood Commons Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hyrcza v. West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Empire Properties, Inc. v. Equireal, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Cannon v. TaborSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Kovach v. SolomonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Robinson v. B.F. Goodrich Tire Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API