Legal Opinion

Heartsill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 8, 1959No. A-12627PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRETT, Judge.

This is an appeal by Paul Heartsill and Claud C. Arnold, plaintiffs in error, defendants below. They were charged by information in the District Court of Carter County, Oklahoma, with the crime of conspiracy to defraud the State of Oklahoma. 21 O.S.1951 § 424. They were tried to a jury, convicted, and the punishment for each fixed at one year in the state penitentiary and a fine of $5,000. Judgment and sentence were entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.

21 O.S.1951 § 424 reads as follows:

“If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Lawlor v. LoeweSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Coates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  3. Hopkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. State v. BlancettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pueblo v. Seda AlvarezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  2. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Vuitch v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Hanf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Glaze v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API