Hadley v. Musselman
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Johnson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The material allegations of the appellants’ *460complaint are these: The appellants were partners, in February, 1883, doing business in Marion county, and in that month bought a saw-mill of A. H. Dutton; this mill was situated in Brown county; prior to the purchase Dutton had leased the mill to one Reese, who had sub-leased it to Musselman, the appellee. The original lease was executed on the second day of March, 1882, and the first year expired in March, 1883. In February, 1883, the appellants attempted to take possession of the mill, but they were resisted by the appellee, who claimed the right…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McMinn v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Bowman v. CockrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Longlois v. LongloisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Nellis v. LathropNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Garwood v. HastingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Morris v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Thomas v. Town of ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Kantack v. KreuerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Whipple v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.