Legal Opinion

Kantack v. Kreuer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1968No. 40993PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment upholding a foreclosure of a mortgage by advertisement.

The facts are not seriously in dispute. On April 28, 1964, defendant, Robert Kreuer, lent to Ben Kantack and his wife, Vera, the sum of $24,296 to enable them to redeem their farm from foreclosure of a mortgage then existing thereon. The time for redemption was about to expire at the time the loan was made. To secure this loan the Kantacks executed a mortgage on their 154-acre farm in Blue Earth County…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Housing Authority of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. Green v. FrazierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Ingelson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Crabtree v. WhiteselleTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Berke v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. G.G.C. Co. v. First National Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. McNeill Family Trust v. Centura BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Guidarelli v. LazarettiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Manion v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API