Legal Opinion
Miller v. United States Trustee (In Re Miller)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 3, 2003No. BAP Nos. NM-01-091, NM-01-098, Bankruptcy No. 98-13174PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNISH, Bankruptcy Judge.
Robert and Mitzi Miller (“Debtors”) appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order, which reduced the amount of attorney fees requested and directed that payment of the approved fees be made through the plan. The United States Trustee (“U.S. Trustee”) filed a cross-appeal seeking remand of the bankruptcy court’s decision regarding the reasonableness of attorney fees awarded for time spent on the confirmation of Debtors’ plan. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the bankruptcy court’s order.
JURISDICTION AND STANDARD OF REVIEW
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Lederman Enterprises, Inc., Debtor. Rubner & Kutner, P.C. v. U.S. Trustee Glen R. Anstine, Chapter 7 Trustee Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Frontier Airlines, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1987
- In Re HellerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Capital v. Unsecured Creditors' Liquidating Trust (In Re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Busch Law Firm, LLC v. Frontline Medical Services LLCBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- David McHugh v. Kenton HopkinsBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2025
- In re: Steven Wayne Porubsky and Shauna Christina PorubskyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2026