Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Rose

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 13, 1961No. 47809PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHLING, Commissioner.

Wilma Kirkpatrick, as Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Kirkpatrick, deceased, her husband, instituted this declaratory judgment action to determine the rights between her husband’s estate and Billy Rose, his successor in office, to certain compensation allowed the Collector of Revenue of Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, her husband having died during his tenure as such Collector. Thereafter, the County of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and the Main Street Levee Improvement District (organized under Ch. 245*) were made parties to the action. No issue is presented…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graves v. PurcellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Smith v. AtterburySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. State v. LudwigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Maxwell v. Andrew CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Cameron County v. FoxTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sprouse v. Carroll County CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Opinion No. (1983), Missouri Attorney General Reports1983
  3. Opinion No. (1983), Missouri Attorney General Reports1983
  4. Opinion No. (1988), Missouri Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API