Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1983)

Missouri Attorney General Reports

Decided March 2, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Dr. Antonio:

This opinion is in response to your questions:

1. If taxes are paid under protest and impounded in a separate fund as provided in Section 139.031.2, RSMo 1978, is a county collector in a third class, nontownship county entitled to his commission for mailing statements, as authorized by Section 52.250, RSMo 1978, on such taxes when the money is paid into the separate fund or when the money is distributed from the fund?

2. If taxes are paid under protest and impounded in a separate fund as provided in Section 139.031.2 RSMo 1978, is a county collector in a third class,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James v. Consolidated Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Xerox Corp. v. TraversSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. Roles v. Earle, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  4. State ex rel. Crawford County R-II School District v. BouseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Kirkpatrick v. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API