Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. Hallas
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 3, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWyhhb, J.
The plaintiff brought this action for personal injuries and damage to his automobile alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant Nick H. Hallas. The latter was the operator of a motor vehicle belonging to his wife, the other defendant. The jury found the issues for the defendants and the court denied the motion to set aside the verdict. From the judgment thereafter rendered the plaintiff appealed.
On the evidence the jury could have found the following facts: Shortly after 5 o’clock in the afternoon of February 22, 1950, the plaintiff was driving easterly on the Merritt…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Meglio v. ComeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Rozycki v. Yantic Grain & Products Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Kapilonuz v. SundmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Jacobs v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
3Cited by7 opinions
- Delfino v. Warners Motor ExpressSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Himmelstein v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Peichert v. JanuarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Gross v. LatimerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Beal v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.