Legal Opinion

Bloodworth v. Bloodworth

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 2003No. A03A0212PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

James R. “Jerome” Bloodworth and Claud Hughes sued their siblings, Henry Bloodworth and Eva Roy Bloodworth Etheredge, in their capacity as the co-executors of their mother’s estate for breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud in the sale of certain farm property to their brother, Stewart Bloodworth, at a price “grossly below the market value.” Appellants sought rescission of the sale, or in the alternative, for damages. After a hearing, the trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

Summary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Ringer v. LockhartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Jenkins v. ShuftenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Home Insurance v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Liner v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jonas v. JonasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Ray v. National Health Investors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Callaway v. Willard.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  4. Roger F. Kahn v. Daniel Lamar Britt, Jr.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Traub v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API