Legal Opinion

Snow, Christensen & Martineau v. Lindberg

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2013No. 20091006PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PARRISH,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

€1 This case requires us to determine whether an attorney-client relationship that existed between the United Effort Plan Trust (UEP Trust or Trust) and its attorneys at the law firm Snow, Christensen & Marti-neau (SCM) continued after the Trust was reformed cy pres1 Specifically, we must determine whether the district court's reformation of the UEP Trust altered the Trust to such an extent that it can no longer be considered the same client for purposes of the attorney-client privilege and rule 1.9 of the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. BarrettUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Jeffs v. StubbsUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Perrigo CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Howard Savings Inst. of Newark v. PeepSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. Society of Professional Journalists v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bistline v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. M.J. v. WisanUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. King v. AppletonSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  4. Cox v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Schroeder v. Utah Attorney General's OfficeUtah Supreme Court · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API