Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1926No. 6 Div. 815PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The indictment contained three counts, and, because of apparent misjoinder, the following occurred as shown by the judgment entry:

“The solicitor moved the court to amend the indictment in this cause by striking therefrom count 2 thereof. The defendant thereupon objected to said amendment by striking count 2. and, the said objections being considered by the court, it is the order and judgment of the court that the objections to said amendment be overruled, and it is the further order and judgment of the court that the said indictment be, and the same is hereby, amended by striking count 2…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Salm v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Taylor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Dannelly v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  5. Merchant v. MerchantSupreme Court of Florida · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  5. Nerud v. City of Mountain BrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API