Legal Opinion

Nerud v. City of Mountain Brook

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 8, 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Doris Nerud was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol and ordered to pay a $400.00 fine and court costs. On appeal, she argues that the circuit court complaint was improperly amended and that the city failed to prove a prima facie case in that the ordinance under which she was convicted was never properly published as required by Alabama Code 1975, Section 11-45-8. We disagree with both contentions and affirm her conviction.

I

The original UTTC charged Nerud with violating Alabama Code 1975, Section 32-5A-191(a)(1) and (2), as amended. Immediately prior to trial in circuit court,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Salinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Ex Parte MaxwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Patton v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Ex Parte O'LearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Tillman Overstreet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Truman v. City of EnterpriseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Hastings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Striplin v. City of DothanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API