Nerud v. City of Mountain Brook
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Doris Nerud was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol and ordered to pay a $400.00 fine and court costs. On appeal, she argues that the circuit court complaint was improperly amended and that the city failed to prove a prima facie case in that the ordinance under which she was convicted was never properly published as required by Alabama Code 1975, Section 11-45-8. We disagree with both contentions and affirm her conviction.
I
The original UTTC charged Nerud with violating Alabama Code 1975, Section 32-5A-191(a)(1) and (2), as amended. Immediately prior to trial in circuit court,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Salinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Ex Parte MaxwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Patton v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Ex Parte O'LearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Tillman Overstreet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Truman v. City of EnterpriseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Hastings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Striplin v. City of DothanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.