Legal Opinion

Palm v. Weber

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1945No. Civ. No. 7097PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

In 1933 Edward A. Palm and Wilhelmina Palm, husband and wife, were possessed of an estate of considerable value, including the entire community interest in a ranch in Sacramento County. On February 3d of that year the spouses executed a promissory note payable to Frank Weber for the sum of $31,152.30, secured by a trust deed on the Sacramento ranch. December 7, 1934, Edward A. Palm died testate, and his wife, Wilhelmina, who was the sole beneficiary under his will, was duly appointed and qualified as executrix. May 24, 1935, Weber filed a claim against the estate for said indebtedness and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estate of PalmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oppenheimer v. Union Pacific RailroadAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API