Legal Opinion

Estate of Palm

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1945No. Civ. 7090PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Frank Weber, as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Edward A. Palm, deceased, has appealed from an order revoking his letters on the grounds of mismanagement and possession of interests adverse to the estate. He has also appealed from that portion of an order settling his first and second accounts which relates to the disallowance of interest on two notes secured by trust deeds on certain property belonging to the estate.

Edward A. Palm and Wilhelmina Palm were husband and wife. Respondents are their son and daughter respectively. The spouses were possessed of an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Thomas v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. County of Los Angeles v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. MonsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Raps v. RapsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Estate of PailheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Estate of ReinhertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Latta v. Western Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  5. Armuress Sapp v. Rogers, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API