Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer v. Union Pacific Railroad

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided May 17, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 8684PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiff has appealed from two orders made by a commissioner of the Los Angeles Municipal Court releasing attachments levied at plaintiff’s direction. A bank account of the corporate defendant had been levied upon and some salary due the defendant Smith from his codefendant was garnished. Following the filing of an undertaking by the corporate defendant with the clerk of the trial court, a commissioner of that court made an ex parte order, October 19, releasing all the property of the defendant Smith from the operation of the attachment. Because the undertaking did not mention…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Norton v. BaranovCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Palm v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bill Benson Motors, Inc. v. Macmorris Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API