Legal Opinion

Nilsen v. Farmers State Bank of Van Hook

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 1929No. 27,498PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Action for deceit in which plaintiff had -a verdict and defendant appealed from an. order :denying its motion for- judgment.nop obstante or for a new trial.

In August, 1919, Oscar Oija- made a written application for a loan of $2,500 on a half section of land near Van Hpok in North Dakota in • which he described the character of the land and the improvements thereon, and appointed defendant his agent- to obtain the loan and receive the money. Appended to the application was an examiner’s report signed .by P. M. Shefveland, who was the cashier of defendant, in which-Shefveland stated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gary v. MayOhio Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Meland v. YoungbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Lawrence v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Puffer v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Luedke v. Town of MukwaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  2. Freese v. LemmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Zimmerschied v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  4. Rien, Trustee, Etc. v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Watkins v. LorenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API