Nilsen v. Farmers State Bank of Van Hook
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Action for deceit in which plaintiff had -a verdict and defendant appealed from an. order :denying its motion for- judgment.nop obstante or for a new trial.
In August, 1919, Oscar Oija- made a written application for a loan of $2,500 on a half section of land near Van Hpok in North Dakota in • which he described the character of the land and the improvements thereon, and appointed defendant his agent- to obtain the loan and receive the money. Appended to the application was an examiner’s report signed .by P. M. Shefveland, who was the cashier of defendant, in which-Shefveland stated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gary v. MayOhio Supreme Court · 1847
- Meland v. YoungbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Lawrence v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Puffer v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Luedke v. Town of MukwaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Freese v. LemmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Zimmerschied v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Rien, Trustee, Etc. v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Watkins v. LorenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.