Legal Opinion

Eshelman v. Snyder

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 7138PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From, the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

We have no brief from the appellees. The appellant has attempted, by means of a bill of exception^, to save exceptions to the overruling of his demurrer to the second paragraph of the complaint, and of his motion for a new trial. The ruling upon the demurrer was had at the May term, 1875, but an exception was not noted, and no time given for filing a bill. The trial was- not had until the October term, 1877, when a verdict was returned in favor of the appellees. Without saving exceptions, or taking any time therefor, the appellant procured of the court an order extending the time for filing a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor of the World v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. NoelIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Simmons v. . CloonanNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Farmer v. Ukiah Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Seymour Water Co. v. LeblineIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gowen v. GilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State ex rel. Gowen v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cheek v. PrestonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Bothwell v. KeeferIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API