Legal Opinion

Seymour Water Co. v. Lebline

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1924No. 24,672PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, C. J.

Appellee, the plaintiff below, recovered a verdict and judgment against appellant for $2,011.38, as damages for the construction of a dam in the “Driftwood” or East Fork of White river, at Rockford, near Seymour, Indiana, by which the river was caused to overflow some of his land. Appellant’s demurrers to the complaint, and to each of several paragraphs of reply were overruled, as was also its motion for a new trial, and appellant excepted to each ruling and has challenged each of them by a proper assignment of errors.

The complaint was filed January 10, 1921. It alleged in very general terms…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Snell v. . LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Hennessy v. . MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Scott v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  4. Terre Haute v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NoftsgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Shipman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. LewellenIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Quinn v. StoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Rudolph v. Glendale Improvement Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Celebration Worship Center, Inc. v. Patrick Tucker and Carolyn P. Tucker, A/K/A Patty TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API