Legal Opinion
Billman v. Folsum
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 26, 1959No. Civ. No. 5629PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, Chief Judge.
The above-entitled cause came before the Court for trial without a jury.
On October 4, 1956, the Appeals Council of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare determined that Joseph E. Billman was not entitled to social security benefits for 1955. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g), Billman thereafter brought action in this Court to review the decision of the Appeals Council. Section 405(g) states:
“Any individual, after any final decision of the Secretary made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Thurston v. HobbyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carlson v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1971
- Ford v. RibicoffDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1961