Carlson v. Richardson
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review a “final decision” of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. The plaintiff has exhausted all administrative remedies, 1 and the Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration informed the plaintiff: “[T]he hearing examiner’s decision stands as the final decision of the Secretary in your case.”
The ease appears in the posture of cross-motions for summary judgment. The pleadings have been filed, together with a transcript of the record of Mr. Carlson’s hearing and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Francis J. Dondero v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Sellmayer Packing Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Rubenstein v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965
- Billman v. FolsumDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ted Martin v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Rebak v. MatthewsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977