Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Richardson

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 20, 1971No. Civ. 13925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review a “final decision” of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. The plaintiff has exhausted all administrative remedies, 1 and the Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration informed the plaintiff: “[T]he hearing examiner’s decision stands as the final decision of the Secretary in your case.”

The ease appears in the posture of cross-motions for summary judgment. The pleadings have been filed, together with a transcript of the record of Mr. Carlson’s hearing and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Francis J. Dondero v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Sellmayer Packing Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  4. Rubenstein v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965
  5. Billman v. FolsumDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ted Martin v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Rebak v. MatthewsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API