Legal Opinion

Immuno International v. Hillsborough County

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 12, 1985No. 83-3014PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge:

In our earlier opinion, we held that certain Ordinances of the County of Hillsbor-ough, Florida were void as having been preempted by Federal Statutes and Regulations controlling the collection of human blood plasma from paid donors.1 We did not, therefore, reach other contentions by Automated Medical challenging the legality of the Hillsborough County Ordinances and Regulations issued thereunder.

The Supreme Court’s order in the case was as follows:

We hold that Hillsborough County Ordinances 80-11 and 80-12, and their implementing regulations, are not preempted by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc. v. Hillsborough County, Florida, and Hillsborough County Health DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Immuno International, A.G. v. Hillsborough County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API