Legal Opinion
O'NEIL v. Putnam Retail Management, LLP
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 21, 2005No. CIV.A.05-10469 PBSPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, David M. O’Neil claims that he was terminated from his job at defendant, Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership (“Putnam”), because of discrimination based on his status as a member of the United States Navy Reserves, in violation of the Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act (“USERRA”), 38 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq. (1994). He also asserts that defendant violated an implied contract to transfer his securities licenses. 1 Defendant moves to dismiss on the grounds that both claims are time-barred and that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Jorge Correa-Martinez v. Rene Arrillaga-BelendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Gilbert Roeder, Etc. v. Alpha Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Robert P. Coyne v. City of SomervilleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Potts v. Howard University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Rivera-Cartagena v. Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
- Hogan v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2009
- Wagner v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2008
- Rivera-Cartagena v. Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.