Legal Opinion

Potts v. Howard University Hospital

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 10, 2009No. Civil Action No.: 08-0706 (RMU)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Construing the Defendants’ “reply” as a Motion to Alter or Amend an Interlocutory Judgment; Reconsidering the Partial Denial of the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court on the defendants’ submission of March 3, 2009, which, for the reasons discussed below, the court construes as a motion to alter or amend its interlocutory judgment of February 20, 2009. The plaintiff brought this action under the D.C. Code as well as the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”), 38 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Jane Doe v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  3. Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Brookens v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Gates v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Berlin v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API