Legal Opinion

Elim Missionary Assemblies v. Cunningham

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 1967No. Civ. No. 8264PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.

Following a special jury verdict in a will contest before probate, a judgment was entered admitting Maude Straisinger’s will to probate. Contestants appeal from the judgment.

In their written opposition to the probate of the will, contestants specified five grounds: Unsound mind, improper execution of the will, fraud, undue influence, and estoppel. Improper execution was abandoned at pretrial; the causes of action based upon unsound mind and estoppel were dismissed on a motion for a nonsuit at the close of contestants’ case; and the jury was directed to find against contestants on the fraud…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of StraisingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API