General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Shasky
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
The plaintiff, General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. (General), brought a declaratory judgment proceeding requesting that a policy issued by it to defendant (the insured) be declared not to afford uninsured motorist coverage under the circumstances of this case. The case was tried to the court without a jury and General appeals from an adjudication that the insured was afforded such coverage.
General’s liability policy to the insured contained uninsured motorist coverage. At a time during the life of the policy, when the insured was riding his bicycle down the street and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Pattani v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BrowerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- In re the Arbitration between Vanguard Insurance & PolchlopekNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Bowsher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Oregon Automobile Insurance Co. v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.