Legal Opinion

General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Shasky

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1973PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

The plaintiff, General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. (General), brought a declaratory judgment proceeding requesting that a policy issued by it to defendant (the insured) be declared not to afford uninsured motorist coverage under the circumstances of this case. The case was tried to the court without a jury and General appeals from an adjudication that the insured was afforded such coverage.

General’s liability policy to the insured contained uninsured motorist coverage. At a time during the life of the policy, when the insured was riding his bicycle down the street and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Pattani v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BrowerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  4. In re the Arbitration between Vanguard Insurance & PolchlopekNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Bowsher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co. v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API