Legal Opinion
McKelvy v. Metal Container Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 7, 1988No. 87-3525PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
The principal issue on this appeal involves the interpretation of the statute of limitations in the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Because the district court properly found that the plaintiff’s claim was not time-barred, we affirm as to that issue. However, because the district court used an improper interest rate in figuring the prejudgment interest, we vacate and remand as to that issue.1
*450I. FACTS
Defendant Metal Container Corporation (“Metal Container”) fired plaintiff Lynn McKelvy from his job as a shift superintendent at Metal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arthur N. ARONSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CROWN ZELLERBACH, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hacienda HotelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Weaver v. Casa Gallardo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Janice GRIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- George v. GTE Directories Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2000
- Rice v. Sunrise Express, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.