State v. Neslund
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. W. II. McHenry, Judge. Deeendant was indicted for the crime of selling, exchanging, delivering and having in his possession, with intent to sell, exchange and expose and offer for sale, misbranded and adulterated food. A jury was waived, and upon submission to the court the defendant was found not guilty. From the judgment the State appeals. —
1Opinion of the Court
Deemer, J. —
The sections of the law under which the *462indictment was found being 4999a2,0, 4999a21, and 4999a22 (Code Supp. 1901), read as follows:
No person, firm or corporation, by bimself, officer, servant or agent, or as the officer, servant or agent of any other person, firm or corporation, shall manufacture or introduce into the State, or solicit or take orders for delivery, or sell, exchange, deliver or have in his possession with the intent to sell, exchange or expose or offer for sale or exchange, any article of food which is adulterated or misbranded, within the meaning of this act.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SchollenbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Haley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. Gelpi v. Board of AssessorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. State Dairy & Food CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Linnenkamp v. LinnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Package Machinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951