Haley v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Harlan county. Tried below before Gaslin, J. cited: Net's?/ v. Hardin, 135 U. S., 100; State v. Winters, 44 Kan., 723; State v. Coonan, 48 N. W. Rep. [Ia.], 921; State v. Fraser, 48 N. W. Rep. [N. Dak.], 343. cited: State v. Chapman, 47 N. W. Rep. [S. Dak.], 411; Brown v. State of Maryland, 12 Wheat. [U. S.], 419 State v. Shapleigh, 27 Mo., 344; State v. North, 27 Mo., 464; In re Beine, 42 Fed. Rep., 546; In re Harman, 43 Fed. Rep., 372.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
July 14, 1890, an information was filed in the district court of Harlan county, in one count of which the defendant (plaintiff in error) was charged with the unlawful sale of spirituous liquor to one Charles Hecht on the 4th day of July, 1890, in said county. From the record it further appears that on the 13th day of October, 1890, the plaintiff in error appeared in court accompanied by his attorney, and the state being represented by its attorneys, the case was called for trial, a jury was waived and the case submitted to the court on the following stipulated statement of facts:
“That said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Commonwealth v. SwihartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
3Cited by5 opinions
- McGregor v. ConeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- In re AgnewNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Guckenheimer v. SellersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1897
- State v. NeslundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Leidy v. Metz Bros. Brewing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911