Legal Opinion

Trustees Notley Est. v. Vannattas.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1953No. 2938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioners, trustees under the will and of the estate of Charles Notley, deceased, filed a bill for instructions in the court below praying that they be instructed by the court whether the trust created by the will of Charles Notley, deceased, has terminated and, if so, to whom and in what proportion the trust property should be distributed. Pursuant to stipulation, the first question was briefed and argued before the court below and from the decision of the chancellor that the trust terminated upon the death of the testator's niece, Emma Danford, this interlocutory appeal is taken.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith T. v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. In re the Will of NotleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lidgate v. DanfordHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Kinney v. RobinsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Robinson v. AheongHawaii Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peters McLean, Etc. v. Vannattas.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API