Legal Opinion

In re the Will of Notley

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1904PublishedCited by 13 opinions

EXCEPTIONS PROM C1RCUIT C/OURT, FOURTH OlRCÜIT.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C. J.

(Galbraith, J., dissenting.)

The Circuit Judge, after a hearing, admitted to probate the will and codicils of the decedent, Charles Notley. The contestants, his widow and four children, Charles, William, Maria and David, appealed to the Circuit Court, and the case was there tried before a jury and a different Circuit Judge on the issue of undue influence by the decedent’s niece, Mrs. Emma Dan-ford, née Mullinger. At the close of the contestants’ case, the proponents moved the Court to direct a verdict in their favor. This motion was granted and a verdict was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Delafield v. . ParishNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Rollwagen v. . RollwagenNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Tyler v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Conley v. NailorSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Maynard v. VintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HerbertHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re the Estate of AfongHawaii Supreme Court · 1921
  3. In re the Estate of HeebHawaii Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Peters McLean, Etc. v. Vannattas.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  5. In re the Will of NotleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API