Legal Opinion
United States v. Stringer
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 9, 2006No. CR 03-432-HAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HAGGERTY, Chief Judge.
On September 23, 2004, the grand jury issued a Third Superseding Indictment (hereinafter referred to as the Indictment) charging defendants J. Kenneth Stringer (Stringer), J. Mark Samper (Samper), and William N. Martin (Martin) with fifty counts of conspiracy and securities fraud. Defendants are former executives of FLIR Systems, Inc. (FLIR). The Indictment alleges that defendants acted in concert to inflate FLIR’s revenues through a series of fraudulent revenue recognition and accounting practices in an attempt to defraud FLIR, its Board of Directors,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Brent Eugene Smith, United States of America v. Roberto Osegueya Martinez, United States of America v. Richard Leroy Popp, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Gordon R. Tatum, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Roy Moreno Ramirez, United States of America v. Robert H. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Nicholas J. TweelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. SetserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FitzhenryOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- United States v. StringerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. MahaffyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.