Legal Opinion

Davis v. Edgecomb Metals Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1983No. 8210IC662PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

“In appeals from the Commission, the scope of our review under the Workers’ Compensation Act is (1) to determine if the Commission’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence in the record, and (2) to determine if the findings of fact reasonably support the conclusions of law.” Chandler v. Teer Co., 53 N.C. App. 766, 768, 281 S.E. 2d 718, 719 (1981), aff’d, 305 N.C. 292, 287 S.E. 2d 890 (1982) (per curiam). We find ample competent evidence to support the contested findings, and hold that these findings reasonably support the conclusions of law. We thus affirm the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hollman v. City of Raleigh, Public Utilities DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Fruehauf Corp. v. PraterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Chandler v. Nello L. Teer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Fayne v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Chandler v. Nello L. Teer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roper v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. In Re ManvilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Hill v. Hanes Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Hill v. Hanes Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Gillikin v. Hermitage House Rest HomeNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API