Lee v. Nanny
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries suffered when she was struck by an automobile driven by defendant Pernetti. She alleged that Pernetti was at the time of the accident the agent of defendant Nanny and as such agent was operating the ear in the course of his employment. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant Pernetti in the sum of $2,000, but found that Pernetti was an independent contractor and rendered judgment in favor of defendant Nanny. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment absolving defendant Nanny from liability and also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Chapman v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Hiner v. OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Martinelli v. StabnauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Irvine Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Harris v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Sparks v. L. D. Folsom Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- A. R. Koehler v. Lawrence EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Lewis v. Constitution Life Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.