Legal Opinion

James Pressley v. Sears-Roebuck and Company and Roper Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 13, 1984No. 83-8256PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Circuit Judge:

This diversity action arises out of injuries sustained by the plaintiff James Pressley when his leg was cut by the rotary blade of a lawn mower manufactured by defendant Roper Corporation and sold by defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company. The issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in granting partial summary judgment to defendants under the plaintiffs theories of negligence and strict liability in tort for failure to equip the lawn mower with a deadman control or other like safety feature. We hold that it did not.

Plaintiffs mother-in-law purchased the riding…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Center Chemical Co. v. ParziniSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Hunt v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Wright v. Massey-Harris, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Kubota Tractor Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 13,616 Travis Lee Lamb, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Stephen E. Shepard v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Nettles v. Electrolux Motor ABCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Metz v. Wyeth LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
  5. Smith v. Garden Way, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API