Legal Opinion

Nettles v. Electrolux Motor AB

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 26, 1986No. 85-7321PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:

In this products liability diversity action, appellee, Matthew Nettles, Jr., recovered a $90,000 jury verdict for injuries sustained while operating a chain saw manufactured by the appellant, Electrolux Motor A.B. (Electrolux). We affirm the judgment based on the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine.

I. FACTS

Matthew Nettles, Jr., an illiterate pulpwood cutter with fifteen to twenty years experience, was injured while operating a chain saw manufactured by Electrolux Motor A.B., a Swedish corporation. Nettles alleged that his injury occurred because the saw…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Atkins v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. RodgersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Peat, Inc. v. Vanguard Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Deere & Co. v. GroseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Lawrence Deviner v. Electrolux Motor, AbCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Binakonsky v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API